Author's Editor or Authors' Editor? Who Needs Them Anyway?
I just googled the following lines and got these results:
"author's editor" –"authors' editor"
(I got 8,550 web pages.)
"authors' editor" –"author's editor"
(I got 32,000 web pages.)
(I got 8,550 web pages.)
"authors' editor" –"author's editor"
(I got 32,000 web pages.)
The minus sign (–) means excluding
the term in between double quotes. The results of my search mean that
"authors' editor" is 4 times the more acceptable term than
"author's editor." But, looking at the webpages, I see that Google is
erroneous – it includes entries that say "editors or authors" and
"authors – editor" and "authors, editor" and "authors/editor"
and so on! Google Search does not
know that the double quotes mean "give me this exact phrase and not
anything that looks like It, or where the two words simply appear together"?!
Never mind Google's AI inaccuracy and sloppiness. As an editor
of 4 decades, I prefer "author's editor" (singular) as it is
personal; the author's editor is concerned only at the moment only with you as
author. The term "authors' editor" (plural) refers to many authors at
any one time, suggesting mass assistance by a single editor of a gathering of
authors, and is not realistic.
Authors' editors do
language and substantive editing for authors on texts that are not yet fit
(the) purpose.... The authors' editor helps authors achieve their publishing
goals, by improving format, grammar, style, technical precision, argumentation
and language efficiency. Rather than simply correct manuscripts, the author'
editor dialogues with authors, through notes in the text and by other means, to
inform, query and elicit revision.
(Author's editors) do
"creative" editing, which means that in addition to being responsible
for word usage, grammar, logic, clarity and conciseness, they make original contributions
to the content and organization of the manuscript.
No, author's editing is not
ghostwriting. It is not simply copyediting either, which is the last stage of
editing, when you already have the finished product called a manuscript.
Author's editing is not
only for technical publications. Most people who write something for others to
listen to or consider, don't realize that they are better off if they are
helped by an author's editor in order to improve their material not only to
correct the errors but also to clarify the message, strengthen the argument, or
justify why the information presented is relevant or even crucial to the matter
at hand.
Is an author's editor useful for
virtual assistants? Of course! In fact I think such an editor is more than
useful – he is necessary. Most VAs are
not writers and do not realize that a sharp skill in writing is an added advantage
where the competition is sharp – it always is sharp.
Barbara G Cox says ("The
Author's Editor," January-February 1976, Anesthesia & Analgesia, journals.lww.com):
When a physician or scientist and his editor work together on a
personal basis, a creative interaction takes place. The talents of both merge
to generate a superior product. And the effectiveness of this symbiotic
relationship is enhanced over time. That is, as the author and editor
collaborate on more projects, both the quality of the manuscripts and the
efficiency of the writing process improve. Ultimately, this means that many
hours of the author's time are freed for his scientific endeavors, the
institution saves money, and the published material is superior.
If you are a virtual assistant,
speaker, preacher, speechmaker, columnist, or even a book writer, go look for
your author's editor now! You'll thank me for it.

Comments
Post a Comment